Resources For Teachers For Tutors For Students & Parents AI New Pricing
Year 10 Maths Advanced Single Variable and Bivariant Statistics

Bivariant Data

20 practice questions 1 video lesson Theory + worked examples

Bivariate data pair two variables, and a linear model such as \(V=1800-320t\) describes how one changes as the other grows. In NSW Year 10 Advanced maths you interpret the gradient and intercept in context, use models to predict, and decide when a model or a conclusion from the data is not reasonable (NESA outcome MA5‑DAT‑C‑02).

You will tell univariate from bivariate data, read line graphs of rents and sales over time, and use models for car prices, dam levels, sprint times, zoo visitors and fuel use. You will explain why a model should not be used outside its valid range, why a straight line does not fit doubling data, and why association is not the same as cause. Harder questions find model constants and compare two cafes. It is part of Year 10 Advanced Single Variable and Bivariant Statistics.

Practice 20 questions
Practice questions

Every question with a fully worked solution.

Start practising
Watch 1 video(s)
  • Bivariant Data - Video - The best stats you've ever seen Watch
Create a free accountTrack your progress and save your work as you go.
Create free account

Theory

Bivariate data record two variables for each individual, or one variable over time. They are shown on scatter plots and line graphs and are often summarised by a linear model such as \(y = mx + c\). This Year 10 Advanced maths page covers choosing displays, reading trends, using and building linear models, knowing where a model is valid, and the difference between an association and a cause.

Univariate data have one variable (e.g. heights of students): use a histogram, dot plot or box plot. Bivariate data pair two variables for each individual (heights and masses): use a scatter plot. A variable recorded over time (a time series) is shown with a line graph.

A linear model \(y = mx + c\) describes a linear trend. The gradient \(m\) is the change in \(y\) for each increase of \(1\) in \(x\) (with units, e.g. dollars per year); \(c\) is the value of \(y\) when \(x = 0\).

A model has a valid range: the values of \(x\) it was built from. Outside it (extrapolation) it may give unrealistic answers, such as negative times or masses.

An association between two variables does not show that one causes the other. A third (lurking) variable may affect both.

Univariate and bivariate displaysThree small displays. A histogram for one variable (univariate data), which could also be a dot plot or box plot. A scatter plot for two variables measured on each individual. A line graph joining points for one variable measured over time. one variable histogram, dot plot, box plot two variables scatter plot variable over time line graph
Univariate data have one variable; bivariate data pair two variables for each individual (or one variable with time).
A linear model and its valid rangeThe model V = 1800 - 320t drawn as a solid line from t = 0 to t = 4 inside a shaded valid region. Beyond t = 4 it continues as a dashed line that drops below zero, where the model gives impossible negative values. t V 1 2 3 4 5 500 1000 1500 valid: 0 ≀ t ≀ 4 extrapolation: beyond t = 5.6, V < 0 (impossible) 0
A linear model is only trusted for the values it was built from. Outside that range it can give impossible answers, such as a negative price.
\[\text{percentage change} = \dfrac{\text{new} - \text{old}}{\text{old}} \times 100\% \qquad \text{percentage error} = \dfrac{|\text{predicted} - \text{actual}|}{\text{actual}} \times 100\%\]
new−oldold×100%
ModelGradient meansIntercept means
\(C = 0.12d + 1.5\) (fuel, L, for \(d\) km)\(0.12\) L per km, i.e. \(12\) L per \(100\) km\(1.5\) L used even for a tiny trip
\(P = 950 - 12d\) (rent, \(d\) km from the city)rent falls \(\$12\) for each extra kmrent at the city centre (if \(d = 0\) is in range)
Working with models. Substitute to predict; solve an equation to go backwards; set two models equal to find when they match; and for a range of outputs solve a double inequality, reversing the signs if you divide by a negative number.
Non-linear trends. If the changes keep growing (e.g. a number doubling each year: \(5, 10, 20, 40\)), a straight line does not fit; continue the pattern instead (\(80\), then \(160\)).

Choosing and reading a display

  1. Count the variables: one (univariate) or two per individual (bivariate)? Is one of them time?
  2. Line graphs: read values at points, find changes between consecutive points (the steepest segment is the largest change), and describe the overall trend.
  3. Two lines on one graph: compare where one is above the other; if one rises while the other falls, they have a negative association.

Using a linear model

  1. Interpret the gradient and intercept with units, and say whether the intercept is sensible.
  2. Predict by substituting, or solve for the input that gives a target output.
  3. Build a model from two given facts: two equations in the unknown constants, solved simultaneously.
  4. Check validity: is the input inside the valid range? Is the output realistic?
  5. Cause or association? Unless the data come from a controlled experiment, name a possible third variable instead of claiming a cause.
Example 1 β€” Reading a line graph
The line graph shows the number of visitors to a museum each year.
Museum visitors per yearA line graph of museum visitors in thousands: 2018 52, 2019 55, 2020 21, 2021 30, 2022 48, 2023 60, 2024 63. thousand 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 10 20 30 40 50 60
(i) Is this univariate or bivariate data? (ii) Between which two years was the largest increase? (iii) Find the percentage increase from 2020 to 2024. (iv) Describe the trend.
Solution

(i) Two variables, year and visitors: bivariate (a time series), so a line graph suits it.

(ii) Year-to-year changes (thousand): \(+3,\ -34,\ +9,\ +18,\ +12,\ +3\). The largest increase, \(18\) thousand, was from 2021 to 2022.

(iii)

\(\dfrac{63 - 21}{21} \times 100\%\)\(=\)\(\mathbf{200\%}\)

(iv) Visitors were steady at about \(52\) to \(55\) thousand, dropped sharply in 2020, then rose every year, passing the earlier level by 2023.

63−2121×100%=200%
Example 2 β€” Using a linear model
The value \(V\) dollars of a laptop \(t\) years after purchase is modelled by \(V = 1800 - 320t\), for \(0 \le t \le 4\).
(i) What do \(1800\) and \(320\) mean?
(ii) Predict the value after \(2.5\) years.
(iii) When does the model give \(\$520\)?
(iv) Explain what goes wrong at \(t = 6\).
Solution

(i) \(1800\): the value when new (\(t = 0\)), \(\$1800\). \(320\): the value falls by \(\$320\) each year.

(ii)

\(V\)\(=\)\(1800 - 320(2.5) = \mathbf{\$1000}\)

(iii)

\(1800 - 320t\)\(=\)\(520\)
\(320t\)\(=\)\(1280\)
\(t\)\(=\)\(\mathbf{4}~\text{years}\)

(iv) \(V = 1800 - 320(6) = -120\). A laptop cannot have a negative value. \(t = 6\) is outside \(0 \le t \le 4\), so the model should not be used there (extrapolation).

V=1800−320t
Example 3 β€” Building a model, then an inequality
The water in a tank, \(W\) litres, \(t\) hours after a tap is opened, is modelled by \(W = a - bt\) for \(0 \le t \le 15\). The model gives \(620\) L at \(4\) hours and \(380\) L at \(10\) hours.
(i) Find \(a\) and \(b\), and interpret them.
(ii) For what times does the model give between \(300\) L and \(500\) L?
Solution

(i) Two facts give two equations.

\(a - 4b\)\(=\)\(620 \quad (1)\)
\(a - 10b\)\(=\)\(380 \quad (2)\)
\((1) - (2):\quad 6b\)\(=\)\(240\)
\(b\)\(=\)\(\mathbf{40},\quad a = 620 + 160 = \mathbf{780}\)

The tank starts with \(780\) L and loses \(40\) L per hour.

(ii) Solve \(300 \le 780 - 40t \le 500\). Subtract \(780\), then divide by \(-40\), which reverses the inequality signs.

\(-480 \le -40t\)\(\le\)\(-280\)
\(12 \ge t\)\(\ge\)\(7\)
\(7 \le t\)\(\le\)\(12\)

From \(\mathbf{7}\) to \(\mathbf{12}\) hours after opening, inside the valid range.

300≤780−40t≤500
Example 4 β€” How good is a trend prediction?
A town had \(12\) thousand phone subscribers in 2016, \(15\) thousand in 2018 and \(18\) thousand in 2020.
(i) Use this trend to predict the number in 2024.
(ii) The actual 2024 number was \(21\) thousand. Find the percentage error of the prediction, compared with the actual value, to \(1\) decimal place.
(iii) Give a reason the prediction was off.
Solution

(i) The number rises \(3\) thousand every \(2\) years, that is \(1.5\) thousand per year.

\(2024\)\(=\)\(18 + 4 \times 1.5 = \mathbf{24}~\text{thousand}\)

(ii)

\(\text{error}\)\(=\)\(24 - 21 = 3~\text{thousand}\)
\(\dfrac{3}{21} \times 100\%\)\(=\)\(14.28\ldots\% \approx \mathbf{14.3\%}\)

(iii) 2024 is outside the data (extrapolation). Growth often slows once most people already have the service, so a straight-line trend overestimates.

321×100%≈14.3%

Common pitfalls

A model is not the truth. It describes the data it came from. Outside the valid range it can give impossible values.
Interpret with units. "\(320\)" alone means nothing; "the value falls by \(\$320\) per year" does.
Dividing an inequality by a negative. \(-40t \le -280\) becomes \(t \ge 7\): the sign reverses.
Percentage error uses the actual value. Divide the error by the actual value, not by the prediction, unless told otherwise.
Association is not causation. Ice-cream sales and shark sightings rise together, but both are driven by a third variable: hot weather brings more swimmers.

Frequently asked questions

What is bivariate data?

Data that record two variables for each individual, such as the height and mass of each student, or one variable measured over time. It is shown on a scatter plot or a line graph.

What is the difference between univariate and bivariate data?

Univariate data have one variable, displayed with histograms, dot plots or box plots. Bivariate data pair two variables, displayed with scatter plots or line graphs.

What does the gradient of a linear model mean?

It is the change in the output for each increase of 1 in the input, with units, such as dollars per year or litres per kilometre.

Why can a linear model give a wrong answer?

A model is only built from data over a certain range. Outside that range the trend may change, so extrapolation can give unrealistic answers such as negative values.

Does a strong association mean one variable causes the other?

No. It may be a coincidence, or a third variable may affect both. Only a controlled experiment can show cause and effect.