Simultaneous Equations 3X3
Master simultaneous equations in three unknowns for Victorian Year 11 Mathematical Methods (VCAA) — three linear equations solved together to find the single point that satisfies all three.
You will learn to solve these systems by elimination and back-substitution, decide whether a system has one solution, none or infinitely many, and set up and answer worded problems involving three unknowns.
Theory
In Year 11 Mathematical Methods (Unit 1), a \(3\times 3\) system is three linear equations in the three unknowns \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\). This page shows how to solve one by elimination — combine equations to remove a variable, drop to a \(2\times 2\) system, solve it, then back-substitute — and how to tell whether a system has a unique solution, no solution, or infinitely many solutions.
A \(3\times 3\) system of linear equations is three equations in the three unknowns \(x\), \(y\) and \(z\), each of the form \(ax+by+cz=d\). A solution is an ordered triple \((x,\,y,\,z)\) that satisfies all three equations at once.
Geometrically each equation is a plane in space, so solving the system means finding the point (or points) common to all three planes.
The standard technique is elimination: add suitable multiples of one equation to another to cancel a chosen variable. Doing this twice reduces the \(3\times 3\) system to a \(2\times 2\) system in two unknowns, which you solve, then back-substitute to recover the third unknown.
A \(3\times 3\) system has exactly one of three outcomes:
- a unique solution — the three planes meet at a single point;
- no solution — the equations are inconsistent (elimination produces a false statement such as \(0=5\));
- infinitely many solutions — the equations are dependent (elimination produces \(0=0\)).
A general \(3\times 3\) linear system:
Elimination uses a linear combination of two equations to cancel a variable. To remove \(x\) from equations \((1)\) and \((2)\):
How to solve a \(3\times 3\) system by elimination
- Label the three equations \((1)\), \((2)\), \((3)\).
- Eliminate one variable twice. Use equation \((1)\) to remove \(x\) from \((2)\) and from \((3)\), giving two new equations \((4)\) and \((5)\) in \(y\) and \(z\) only.
- Solve the \(2\times 2\) system \((4)\),\((5)\) for \(y\) and \(z\) (eliminate again, or substitute).
- Back-substitute \(y\) and \(z\) into an original equation to find \(x\).
- Check the triple \((x,\,y,\,z)\) in all three original equations.
Label the three equations:
| \(x+y+z\) | \(=\) | \(4 \qquad (1)\) |
| \(x-y+z\) | \(=\) | \(6 \qquad (2)\) |
| \(2x+y-z\) | \(=\) | \(0 \qquad (3)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — subtract (1) from (2):
| \((x-y+z)-(x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(6-4\) |
| \(-2y\) | \(=\) | \(2 \qquad (4)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — subtract \(2\times\)(1) from (3):
| \((2x+y-z)-2(x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(0-8\) |
| \(-y-3z\) | \(=\) | \(-8 \qquad (5)\) |
Solve (4) for \(y\):
| \(-2y\) | \(=\) | \(2\) |
| \(y\) | \(=\) | \(-1\) |
Substitute \(y=-1\) into (5) and solve for \(z\):
| \(-(-1)-3z\) | \(=\) | \(-8\) |
| \(1-3z\) | \(=\) | \(-8\) |
| \(-3z\) | \(=\) | \(-9\) |
| \(z\) | \(=\) | \(3\) |
Back-substitute \(y=-1\), \(z=3\) into (1) for \(x\):
| \(x+(-1)+3\) | \(=\) | \(4\) |
| \(x+2\) | \(=\) | \(4\) |
| \(x\) | \(=\) | \(2\) |
Solution: \(x=2\), \(y=-1\), \(z=3\).
Label the equations:
| \(x+y+z\) | \(=\) | \(4 \qquad (1)\) |
| \(2x-y+z\) | \(=\) | \(0 \qquad (2)\) |
| \(3x+y-2z\) | \(=\) | \(11 \qquad (3)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — (2) minus \(2\times\)(1):
| \((2x-y+z)-2(x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(0-8\) |
| \(-3y-z\) | \(=\) | \(-8 \qquad (4)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — (3) minus \(3\times\)(1):
| \((3x+y-2z)-3(x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(11-12\) |
| \(-2y-5z\) | \(=\) | \(-1 \qquad (5)\) |
Eliminate \(z\) from (4),(5) using \(5\times(4)-(5)\):
| \(5\times(4)\) | \(\Rightarrow\) | \(-15y-5z=-40\) |
| \((5)\) | \(\Rightarrow\) | \(-2y-5z=-1\) |
| \(-13y\) | \(=\) | \(-39\) |
| \(y\) | \(=\) | \(3\) |
Substitute \(y=3\) into (4) for \(z\):
| \(-3(3)-z\) | \(=\) | \(-8\) |
| \(-9-z\) | \(=\) | \(-8\) |
| \(-z\) | \(=\) | \(1\) |
| \(z\) | \(=\) | \(-1\) |
Back-substitute into (1) for \(x\):
| \(x+3+(-1)\) | \(=\) | \(4\) |
| \(x+2\) | \(=\) | \(4\) |
| \(x\) | \(=\) | \(2\) |
Solution: \(x=2\), \(y=3\), \(z=-1\).
Set up one equation per sale:
| \(2x+y+z\) | \(=\) | \(60 \qquad (1)\) |
| \(x+2y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(66 \qquad (2)\) |
| \(3x+y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(88 \qquad (3)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — \(2\times(2)-(1)\):
| \(2(x+2y+2z)-(2x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(2(66)-60\) |
| \(3y+3z\) | \(=\) | \(72\) |
| \(y+z\) | \(=\) | \(24 \qquad (4)\) |
Eliminate \(x\) — \(2\times(3)-3\times(1)\):
| \(2(3x+y+2z)-3(2x+y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(2(88)-3(60)\) |
| \(-y+z\) | \(=\) | \(-4 \qquad (5)\) |
Add (4) and (5) to find \(z\):
| \((y+z)+(-y+z)\) | \(=\) | \(24+(-4)\) |
| \(2z\) | \(=\) | \(20\) |
| \(z\) | \(=\) | \(10\) |
Substitute \(z=10\) into (4) for \(y\):
| \(y+10\) | \(=\) | \(24\) |
| \(y\) | \(=\) | \(14\) |
Substitute into (1) for \(x\):
| \(2x+14+10\) | \(=\) | \(60\) |
| \(2x\) | \(=\) | \(36\) |
| \(x\) | \(=\) | \(18\) |
Prices: adult \(\$18\), concession \(\$14\), child \(\$10\).
Label the equations:
| \(x+2y-z\) | \(=\) | \(3 \qquad (1)\) |
| \(2x-y+3z\) | \(=\) | \(4 \qquad (2)\) |
| \(3x+y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(8 \qquad (3)\) |
Add (1) and (2) to combine two of the equations:
| \((x+2y-z)+(2x-y+3z)\) | \(=\) | \(3+4\) |
| \(3x+y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(7 \qquad (4)\) |
Equation (3) has the same left-hand side \(3x+y+2z\) as (4), but a different right-hand side:
Compare (3) and (4):
| \(3x+y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(8 \qquad (3)\) |
| \(3x+y+2z\) | \(=\) | \(7 \qquad (4)\) |
The one expression \(3x+y+2z\) cannot equal both \(8\) and \(7\), so the system is inconsistent.
No solution — the three planes share no common point.
Common pitfalls
Frequently asked questions
How do you solve a 3x3 system of equations?
Use elimination: pick one variable and remove it from two of the equations, leaving a \(2\times 2\) system in the other two unknowns. Solve that, then back-substitute to find the third unknown.
What does it mean to eliminate a variable?
You add a suitable multiple of one equation to another so that one variable cancels, producing a new equation with fewer unknowns.
How do I know if a 3x3 system has no solution?
When elimination leads to a false statement such as \(0=7\) or \(0=-12\), the equations are inconsistent and there is no solution.
How can a system have infinitely many solutions?
If elimination reduces an equation to \(0=0\), the equations are dependent, so there are infinitely many solutions rather than a single point.
Do I have to eliminate x first?
No — you may eliminate whichever variable is easiest, but you must remove the same variable from both of the other equations to reach a \(2\times 2\) system.
How do I check my answer?
Substitute the triple \((x,\,y,\,z)\) back into all three original equations; each one must be satisfied.